I. Identify your target audience segments and competition
Determine the needs and style of your potential customers and through which media they prefer communication. Only then are you able to develop strong organizational brand that will resonate with them.
Define Your Audience:
Create a deep connection with your target audience—your potential raving fans. The better handle you can get on their individual wants, needs and desires, the better you can serve them.solicit participant perspectives on priorities with which you might not yet be familiar. The better you define this group and their needs, the more effective your marketing can be. Now list your target market segments:
Who wants and needs what you have to offer? The only wrong answer is “everyone.” If you’re a children’s shoe site, you may be designing for infants and children. Are they your target audience? No! They are your end-users, but it’s their parents you need to market to. And, it’s not just any parents—it’s a particular group of parents.
In marketing, you get a lot more “bang for your buck” if you focus your spending on a well-defined group of people that you enjoy working with. Customer interviews are critical at this point to help you define user personas and give you a jumpstart on understanding what type of personality your organization will need develop in order to appeal to your future customers. You also will be validating your usability assumptions and will
Primary Individuals:
· Age group or lifestyle
· Career choices
· Values
· Sex
· Demographics
Secondary Individuals
· Age group or lifestyle
· Career choices
· Values
· Sex
· Demographics
Define your target markets/Industry sectors:
- What is the industry you are targeting?
- Which niches are you targeting?
- Is it viable to define a new space where you can be king?
- How are the other market players solving the problem you’ve identified?
- Are there related problems that are being addressed?
- Where are the holes in those offerings?
- What are their metatags? (keywords)
- Which online and offline sites and communities do prospects rely on and use?
Define Your Competition:
The goal of looking at your competition is two-fold. First, it is critical to identity exactly how your competitors are attempting to address the customer problems your solution tackles—to find holes in their appoach. Is your competition addressing your target markets’ problems narrowly or broadly in terms of a “whole problem” solution? Second, looking at the competitive landscape gives you the perspective and ability to differentiate your offering—which is the goal. You will also need to answer:
- What is the single largest competitive threat to your business that you can identify today?
- Who are your main current and potential competitors as well as potential new entrants?
On his blog, uxmatters, Michael Hawley beautifully illustrates a visual differentiation technique that shouts out the market gaps and opportunities we’re all trying to capture at this stage. I use similar whiteboard freeform graphics, but since Hawley presented his examples so clearly, I’m including them here. His graphic examples of competitive offerings are based on customer priorities measuring competitive dimensions of web sites. In my experience, unless I’m working with an ecommerce company, where the product or service and the branded website are the same, I generally focus first on the product/service solution and look at the visual site or visual identity elements of competition after the key product benefits have been explored.
According to Hawley, when trying to understand the dimensions that could distinguish a competitive space, consider a wide range of attributes and then plot the defining dimensions in a diagram.
“After identifying the dimensions that can distinguish competitors in a given domain, I plot these dimensions in a diagram and, on each axis, label the opposite ends of each spectrum, or scale. As I noted earlier, there does not have to be a good end and a bad end of each spectrum. The important thing is that each dimension be relevant. If possible, I position related dimensions near each other in the diagram.
The example shown in Figure 1 illustrates a competitive differentiator base diagram for a domain-specific content site. Notice that each axis in the diagram correlates to a relevant dimension and each axis is labeled with the scale for that dimension. For example, I measured the Customer Community dimension of the site on a scale from Active to Passive to Non-existent.
Figure 1—A base diagram showing competitive differentiators

- Score the selected competitor sites along the various dimensions and plot them visually.
Once I’ve identified the attributes I will examine and plotted them on a base diagram, I review each competitor and estimate where they fall on each axis. The estimations or ratings are subjective, so if possible, I try to get others to contribute ratings. I repeat this exercise for all of the competitors and for any existing version of the design I’m working on, so I can see how it compares to the others.
As I score each competitor, I plot my estimations on the base diagram, then complete my diagram by giving a visual dimension to the diagram, which resembles a spider web, as shown in Figure 2. This visual aspect of the diagram is important, because it lets me make quick comparisons between competitors during the final step of my analysis.
Figure 2—Diagram showing the scores for a single design

- Compare the diagrams for different competitor solutions and identify the gaps.
Once my subjective analysis of all relevant competitors is complete, I compare all of my diagrams, looking for trends and opportunities to design something different. In some cases, there will be a particular aspect of the competitive space in which there are no competitors. These gaps provide obvious opportunities that I can evaluate for my design. In other cases, the comparison may be more complex. Together, the competitors may have addressed most of the dimensions. However, there may be certain combinations or patterns that are lacking in the competitive space. The visual nature of the diagrams helps me understand the competitive threats and opportunities and develop a strategy that identifies the opportunities on which I want to focus in my design.
Figure 3 shows my subjective ratings of four different competitors across a number of dimensions. A quick visual scan of their different scores reveals one dimension—the vertical axis—in which all of the competitors are on the same end of the spectrum. Envisioning a solution that corresponds to the other end of that spectrum may present an opportunity to differentiate my solution.”
Figure 3—Comparing multiple competitors


















Recent Comments